![matlab 2018b crashes in mac matlab 2018b crashes in mac](https://getintopca.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MathWorks-MATLAB-R2019a-Free-Download-2-4.jpg)
Where C:\IRIS_Tbx needs to be, obviously, replaced with the proper IRIS root folder chosen in Step 3 above.Īlternatively, you can put the IRIS root folder permanently on the Matlab search path (using the menu File – Set Path), and run only the iris.startup command at the beginning of each IRIS session. I haven't thought about the way forward, we can continue the discussion in the associated issue.Each time you want to start working with IRIS, run the following two lines in the command window > addpath C:\IRIS_Tbx I just remembered that we missed VSCODE_CLI context in that PR, so wanted to capture it.
![matlab 2018b crashes in mac matlab 2018b crashes in mac](https://i.redd.it/igwair2ydr281.png)
We are trying to emulate the behavior of opening from finder. That won't be true with #104470, since the app won't be invoked from the shell. Also if there are other use cases, I would like to capture it in this issue. Atleast would be good to verify with the sample from #88306. Sounds good, but I am not familiar with the task execution system to verify if this will work fine. My understanding is that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH might have negative impact on VSCode itself, so a solution that allows to use DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in tasks (or anywhere else in extensions code) should support this variable exclusively for that child process, right?
![matlab 2018b crashes in mac matlab 2018b crashes in mac](https://i2.wp.com/mac-torrent-download.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/01mtljyme4yj.jpg)
Not sure I follow what you said, we have to ensure VSCODE_CLI is present for any invocation of VSCode from the command line. This is something that was missed, I will add it to the PR discussion. This issue has to wait until #104470 lands, the change ensures app is not launched via shell, so VSCODE_CLI wouldn't be effective. Maybe one approach would be to filter DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH by renaming it to VSCODE_DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH and then ensuring to put it back in selected places where users really want it? My understanding is that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH might have negative impact on VSCode itself, so a solution that allows to use DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in tasks (or anywhere else in extensions code) should support this variable exclusively for that child process, right? In other words, I do not think it is a good idea to support DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in this scenario by adding it to the environment of VSCode itself, it should only apply to the processes that are executed that really need it.Īnd to clarify: If we decide to filter DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, it would be everywhere, not just from that getShellEnvironment call. Just remembered a past issue where there was a valid use case for DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in tasks #88306, do you think this use case will continue to work if we filter it from shell env ? This should be fixed once we land #104470 but as a short term fix we can remove the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH from the launch wrapper env so that it doesn't propagate.
![matlab 2018b crashes in mac matlab 2018b crashes in mac](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Uq5ngz6lwYY/W-SfeMStIKI/AAAAAAAAAQ4/58ChxaV3t2gz-MuuuwCKRqsyIPqrKlD2gCEwYBhgL/s1600/Matlab2018bMac1.png)
Chromium has its own process launch management, so the renderer and other process launched don't get affected with this but since we fork the extension host process from the renderer, meaning we use the same helper executable as the renderer but with the shell environments copied to it, it eventually leads to this sort of incorrect symbol load. When a GUI app is launched on mac, it would be usually via the finder or open command (launch services basically isolating the app launch) and not from the terminal which would mean the app is launched as a subprocess of it, getting the same set of environment configuration for all its process. Looking at the past issues filed and why only VSCode is affected, not other electron apps, I think I can conclude where the issue happens to be.